Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2009 Sep 23;58(2):423–428. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.09.010

Table 1.

Correlations between scores on IGT blocks (n=188).

Block 1 2 3 4 5
1 -- −.09 −.01 −.11 −.14
2 -- .58** .40** .19**
3 -- .48** .31**
4 -- .59**
5 --

Note: Scores represent the net score (advantageous – disadvantageous decks) for each block of 20 choices.

**

p < .01