Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 May 1;57(1):32–39. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182119244

Table 3.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Hazards Ratios for CNS endpoint by HLA Alleles.

Alleles Comparisons Unadjusted HR (95%CI) p-value Adjusteda HR (95%CI) p-value Adjusted HR (95%CI) p-value
A homozygotes vs. heterozygotes 0.90 (0.40,2.00) 0.79 2.88 (0.53,15.50) 0.22 0.99 (0.44,2.22) 0.98
B homozygotes vs. heterozygotes 1.33 (0.63,2.81) 0.45 1.64 (0.49,5.44) 0.42 1.35 (0.63,2.91) 0.44
C homozygotes vs. heterozygotes 1.25 (0.66,2.39) 0.5 0.83 (0.28,2.45) 0.73 1.34 (0.70,2.58) 0.38
DRB1 homozygotes vs. heterozygotes 1.67 (0.93,3.01) 0.09 1.77 (0.68,4.58) 0.24 1.82 (1.00,3.29) 0.05
A-1 presence vs. absence 1.59 (0.93,2.72) 0.09 1.03 (0.32,3.31) 0.97 1.66 (0.96,2.86) 0.07
A-24 presence vs. absence 2.01 (1.04,3.88) 0.04 2.84 (0.76,10.64) 0.12 2.04 (1.07,3.89) 0.03
B-27 presence vs. absence - *<0.0001 - - - -
B-57 presence vs. absence 0.68 (0.27,1.71) 0.42 0.35 (0.04,2.79) 0.32 0.62 (0.23,1.66) 0.34
Cw-5 presence vs. absence 1.78 (0.93,3.42) 0.08 4.76 (1.52,14.90) 0.01 1.96 (1.01,3.79) 0.05
DQB1-2 presence vs. absence 0.58 (0.36,0.93) 0.02 0.53 (0.21,1.34) 0.18 0.61 (0.37,0.99) 0.04
a

Adjusted for baseline covariates: race, gender, age, baseline log HIV-1 RNA, change of log HIV-1 RNA from baseline to week 24 and 48, baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count and percent, change of CD4+ lymphocyte count from baseline to week 24 and 48, Baseline WAZ Score and treatment.

b

Adjusted for other genotypes: CX3CR1-280-T/M, SDF-1-180-G/A, and MBL2-P/Q

*

The p-value is from the robust score test of the Cox model in order to account for the sampling weight in the variance estimation. Since none of the subjects possessing the B-27 allele was observed to have a CNS endpoint during follow-up, no HR and 95% CI estimates can be calculated.