Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011 Apr;24(2):345–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00837.x

Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses of clinicopathologic factors associated with BRAF mutation

BRAF wild-type BRAF mutation Odds-ratio (95%CI)# p-value
European and North American melanomas n=409* N=201 N=208
Anatomic site of melanoma
    Face, scalp, upper extremities 84 33 1
    Trunk 76 121 2.7 (1.5-4.9) 0.001
    Lower Extremities 41 54 2.2 (1.1-4.1) 0.018
Solar elastosis score
    ≥6 100 43 1
    0 to 5 101 165 1.8 (1.1-3.1) 0.024
Age at diagnosis
    ≤ 60 years 78 140 1
    > 60 years 123 68 0.4 (0.3-0.7)## <0.001

Australian melanomas n=118** N=73 N=45
Anatomic site of melanoma
    Face and scalp 46 15 1
    Trunk 27 30 2.8 (1.2-6.6) 0.014
Solar elastosis score
    9 or 10 19 2 1
    0 to 8 54 43 4.3 (0.91-20.0) 0.067
Age at diagnosis
    > 60 years 46 20 1
    ≤ 60 years 27 25 2.1 (0.91-4.8) 0.085
*

Sample size reduced because of missing values for age and sex

**

sample size reduced because of missing values for age

#

95%-CI = 95% confidence interval; both models were adjusted for the confounding effects of gender.

##

If the >60 years group was used as the reference category, the odds ratio (95%CI) was 2.4 (1.5-3.7).

Note: For the Australian samples, the cutoff used to dichotomize CSD was optimized due to the smaller sample size. For the same cutoff used for the European and Australian samples see Supplementary Table 2.