Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):72–80. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181930174

Table 3.

Agreement between thermodilution CO and investigational CO-from-ABP algorithms

Investigational Predictors of COTD “Best Possible Single Calibration” (C1) 95% Limits Agreement (±L/min) KS Test vs. Mean Arterial Pressure (p) “First Pairing Calibration” (C2) 95% Limits Agreement (±L/min) % Agreement of Directional Δ's vs. COTD
Liljestrand –1.76/+1.41 0.0001 –2.81/+2.04 78b
Corrected impedance –1.91/+1.57a <0.01 –3.39/+2.28 78b
Pulse pressure –2.07/+1.73 >0.05 –3.05/+2.76 74b
Systolic area –2.07/+1.73c >0.05 –2.85/+3.05 77b
Systolic area with Kouchoukos correction –2.08/+1.71 >0.05 –3.20/+2.89 78b
AC power (root-mean-square) –2.09/+1.73 >0.05 –3.12/+2.78 79b
Diastolic decay –2.23/+1.77 >0.05 –3.22/+2.57 78b
Mean arterial pressure –2.20/+1.82 –3.19/+3.42 56
Herd –2.66/+1.89 >0.05 –3.65/+3.16 78b

CO, cardiac output; ABP, arterial blood pressure; COTD, CO thermadilution; KS, Kolmogorov-Smirnov; AC, alternating current.