Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Health Prof. 2010 Dec 29;34(4):448–463. doi: 10.1177/0163278710391086

Table 2.

Comparison of web-based (n=262) and mail (n=102) responses.

Web-based version (n= 262) N (%) Mail version (n= 102) N (%) P -value

Average number of patients evaluated per month who report heavy or irregular menstrual bleeding
 1–10 123(48) 42(44) P=0.55
 11 or more 131(52) 53(56)

Average number of endometrial ablations performed per month
 None 53(21) 12(13) P=0.002
 1–5 188(74) 66(70)
 6 or more 14(5) 16(17)

Average number of hysterectomies performed per month
 None 44(17) 7(7) P=0.06
 1–5 193(75) 79(84)
 6 or more 19(7) 8(9)

Respondents who replied that they always ask the patient which treatments she has tried for her bleeding 247(97) 82(92) P=0.07

Respondents who reported that they use questionnaires routinely in their practice 178(70) 57(64) P=0.29

Respondents who answered at least 2 of 3 of the knowledge questions correctly 67 (26) 19 (21) P = 0.39
*

Missing data: 5 online respondents logged in and did not answer any questions. Thirteen mail respondents answered only the first three screening questions. Other columns that do not add up to the total number of respondents represent random missing responses to individual questions.

We randomly selected one representative measure from each of the following sections of the survey: typical discussions with patients with AUB, usage of questionnaires in clinical practice, and knowledge about treatment for AUB