Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 24;30(8):3022–3042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4029-09.2010

Table 2.

Statistics of response modulation during sinusoidal rotation (0.5 Hz)

Rotation
Max direction
Yaw Roll Pitch
p_f1 ≤ 0.01
    All (n = 364) 29 (8%) 68 (19%) 59 (16%) 114 (31%)
    Upper bank (n = 136) 17 (12%) 40 (29%) 33 (24%) 64 (47%)
    Tip (n = 126) 7 (6%) 23 (18%) 20 (16%) 37 (29%)
    Lower bank (n = 102) 5 (5%) 5 (5%) 6 (6%) 13 (13%)
p_f2 ≤ 0.01, p_f1 > 0.01
    All (n = 364) 51 (14%) 40 (11%) 28 (8%) 66 (18%)
    Upper bank (n = 136) 7 (5%) 9 (7%) 4 (3%) 9 (7%)
    Tip (n = 126) 17 (14%) 9 (7%) 6 (5%) 19 (15%)
    Lower bank (n = 102) 27 (26%) 22 (22%) 18 (18%) 38 (37%)
p_f1 > 0.01, p_f2 > 0.01
    All (n = 364) 284 (78%) 256 (70%) 277 (76%) 184 (51%)
    Upper bank (n = 136) 112 (82%) 87 (64%) 99 (73%) 63 (46%)
    Tip (n = 126) 102 (81%) 94 (75%) 100 (79%) 70 (56%)
    Lower bank (n = 102) 70 (69%) 75 (74%) 78 (76%) 51 (50%)

Data shown represent number of cells and corresponding percentages relative to the total population (bold), upper bank, tip, and lower bank for each row, respectively. Data recorded in monkey U (n = 247: left hemisphere and 51: right hemisphere) and monkey J (n = 21: left hemisphere and 45: right hemisphere).