Table 7.
Tooth type | Element | Description for consistency (number of study) | Evidence synthesis according to study quality | Perceived shortcoming | Evidence synthesis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deciduous tooth | Strength of association | Strong (2), moderate (5), weak and moderate (2), weak (1), no association (1) | Moderate to strong evidence for weak to moderate association | There was no control group in current smokers in natural experiment. | Possible evidence |
Natural experiment | Smaller effect size and no association (3) in previous exposure group | Strong evidence for natural experiment | Natural experiment and dose-response relationship were reported from two countries. Cohort study was not conducted. | ||
Dose-response relationship | Obvious relationship between level of exposure and the effect size (5) | Strong evidence for dose-response relationship. | |||
Permanent tooth | Strength of association | Moderate (1), weak (5 a), and no association (2) | Moderate evidence for weak association | Only one study reported results of natural experiment and dose-response relationship. | Insufficient evidence |
Natural experiment | Effect size was similar in previous and current exposure groups (1) | Limited evidence for natural experiment | |||
Dose-response relationship | Relationship between level of exposure and the effect size was not clear (1) | Limited evidence for natural experiment |
one study with cohort format.