Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 30.

Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Aug 6;193(1):90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.07.035

Figure 4 A-D shows comparative amplitude vs. ACE stability during baseline in a 13g weight (rat #6) injury animal in all four limbs. There is a comparatively larger amount of variability during the baseline period as seen for these amplitude measurements. There is some drift in the coherence estimate. This example shows a moderate decrease in ACE value with the injury induction as evidenced by slope change in the left hindlimb. The arrows indicate injury time.

Figure 4 A-D shows comparative amplitude vs. ACE stability during baseline in a 13g weight (rat #6) injury animal in all four limbs. There is a comparatively larger amount of variability during the baseline period as seen for these amplitude measurements. There is some drift in the coherence estimate. This example shows a moderate decrease in ACE value with the injury induction as evidenced by slope change in the left hindlimb. The arrows indicate injury time.