Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Early Adolesc. 2011 Apr;31(2):271–299. doi: 10.1177/0272431610363157

Table 3.

Linguistic Acculturation and Rate of Cigarette Initiation

Model 1 boys Model 2 girls Model 3 boys Model 4 girls Model 5 boys Model 6 girls
Linguistic acculturation
 With family 1.03 (0.42) 1.10 (1.26)
 With friends 0.90 (−1.40) 0.91 (−1.16)
 With media 1.06 (0.81) 1.18* (1.85)
Control variables
 Free or reduced lunch 0.80 (−0.78) 1.24 (0.54) 0.74 (−1.04) 1.13 (0.30) 0.80 (−0.79) 1.25 (0.54)
 Self-reported grades 0.90** (−2.50) 0.92 (−1.48) 0.90** (−2.52) 0.93 (−1.34) 0.90** (−2.50) 0.92 (−1.46)
 Prevention program 1.28 (1.30) 0.90 (−0.47) 1.31 (1.43) 0.89 (−0.49) 1.28 (1.32) 0.89 (−0.52)

Note: There were no significant differences (p < .05) in coefficients between boys and girls. Coefficients are odds ratios, with t-statistics in parentheses.

*

p < .10.

**

p < .05.

***

p < .01.

****

p < .001, two-tailed tests.