Skip to main content
. 2000 Jul;10(7):1001–1010. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.7.1001

Table 2.

Most Significant Hexamers in 3′ Fragments: Clustered Hexamers

Hexamer Observed (expected)a % sites Pb Position average ± SD   Locationc






graphic file with name 9t2_L1TT.jpg 3286 (317) 58.2 0 −16 ± 4.7 graphic file with name 9t2b_L1TT.jpg
843 (112) 14.9 0 −17 ± 5.3
156 (32) 2.7 6 × 10−57 −16 ± 5.9
180 (53) 3.2 4 × 10−45 −18 ± 7.8
76 (23) 1.3 1 × 10−18 −17 ± 5.9
72 (21) 1.3 2 × 10−18 −18 ± 6.9
96 (33) 1.7 2 × 10−19 −18 ± 6.9
70 (16) 1.2 5 × 10−23 −18 ± 8.7
43 (14) 0.7 1 × 10−9 −18 ± 6.3
49 (11) 0.8 5 × 10−17 −18 ± 8.9
36 (11) 0.6 1 × 10−08 −17 ± 8.1
a

Expected occurrences based on a random distribution in a database of same nucleotide composition. 

b

Probability of reaching the observed frequency by chance based on a cumulative binomial distribution. All sequences containing the most significant hexamer were removed from the database before the next most significant hexamer was sought. 

c

Location of the last base of hexamer. Position 0 is the putative poly(A) site. 

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure