Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 7;10(6):M111.009399. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.009399

Table II. Regression analysis for treatment effects on tumor growth and Kaplan-Meier analysis for treatment effects on survival. Data are listed as mean with their 95% confidence intervals in parentheses.

Treatment n Growth curveav(d) r Tumor doubling time(d)b Tumor growth delay(d)c Median survival 30-days survival
LLC Control 7 In(v) = 0.2009d–1.69 0.9509 3.46 (3.23–3.68) 8.45 (8.27–8.64) 18.0 (13.59–26.41) 0.00
VNP 7 In(v) = 0.1583d–1.81 0.9733 4.44 (4.27–4.61) 11.43 (11.22–11.64) 35.0 (25.92–42.08)** 0.71
VNPpadhEEnd 7 In(v) = 0.1341d–1.95 0.9652 5.21 (4.99–5.42) 14.54 (14.22–14.86) 49.0 (33.46–52.54) 0.86
B16F10 Control 8 In(v) = 0.2342d–1.77 0.9814 2.96 (2.85–3.08) 7.56 (7.48–7.64) 11.5 (9.42–13.08) 0.00
VNP 8 In(v) = 0.1186d–1.53 0.9586 5.84 (5.70–5.98) 12.90 (12.67–13.05) 19.5 (13.60–26.65)** 0.00
VNPpadhEEnd 8 In(v) = 0.0996d–1.70 0.9833 6.96 (6.86–7.07) 17.07 (16.97–17.17) 28.5 (16.18–32.82)** 0.25

a Regression growth curves summarize volume (V, cm3) dependence on time (d, days) from initial treatment, with correlation coefficients indicated by r.

b Tumor doubling time was derived from exponential growth curves.

c Growth delay was determined by assessing the time interval to 1000 mm3, (mean ± S.D., ;†p < 0.0001, VNPpadhEEndostatin vs. VNP, **p < 0.01). Median survival time was analyzed by software MedCalc and is listed with their 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. Significance is indicated as **p < 0.01 (in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) treatment: VNP vs. control, in B16F10 treatment: VNP vs. control, VNPpadhEEndostatin vs. VNP), ;†p < 0.0001 (in LLC treatment: VNPpadhEEndostatin vs. VNP).