Skip to main content
. 2011 May 11;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1756-0381-4-12

Table 2.

Statistical significance of the difference in performance between the methods.

ANOVA
P = 3.05 × 10-5
GP vs. SVM-K1
P = 0.0001
GP vs. SVM-K2
P = 0.3107
GP vs. SVM-K3
P = 0.0008
GP vs. MP
P = 0.0009
GP vs. RF
P = 0.0103

First line shows ANOVA test on the 6 samples of solutions found by each method, while second line depicts pairwise 2-tailed Student t-tests comparing GP with each other method.