Table 6.

False negative prediction: statistical significance of the difference in performance between the methods.

ANOVA P = 2.75 × 10-9
GP vs. SVM-K1	GP vs. SVM-K2	GP vs. SVM-K3	GP vs. MP	GP vs. RF
P = 2.74 × 10-6	P = 3.32 × 10-6	P = 1.27 × 10-10	P = 8.53 × 10-6	P = 4.65 × 10-7

First line shows ANOVA test on the 6 samples of solutions found by each method, while second line depicts pairwise 2-tailed Student t-tests comparing GP with each other method.