Table 3.

Distribution of Molecular Markers among Genomes and Chromosomes

Chromosome	NM	ML		MIL		CV
H	L	H	L	H	L
A genome
1A	24	152.0	138.6	10.86	13.86	82.78	79.87
2A	33	207.8	250.3	13.85	16.69	103.75	89.57
3A	40	267.4	261.7	10.70	12.46	91.40	89.25
4A	37	193.3	192.5	7.43	8.75	89.77	95.20
5A	38	271.6	274.9	11.32	11.00	74.20	76.73
6A	22	180.2	179.4	12.01	14.95	89.84	63.28
7A	37	317.0	309.8	13.21	14.75	76.76	77.76
Subtotal	231 (42.1%)	1589.3	1607.2
WM				11.11	12.76	86.05	82.71
B genome
1B	58	200.4	200.2	6.13	6.23	95.11	125.20
2B	53	256.2	257.9	7.54	10.76	87.00	64.50
3B	54	250.5	266.1	9.63	8.58	99.17	106.53
4B	17	82.9	104.6	9.21	10.46	80.89	78.30
5B	48	310.0	276.7	11.07	11.07	86.09	76.96
6B	39	237.1	239.2	9.88	9.57	83.70	86.83
7B	49	243.0	227.8	9.72	8.76	115.12	106.28
Subtotal	318 (57.9%)	1580.1	1572.5
WM				8.88	9.12	93.27	95.01
Total	549	3169.4	3179.7
GWM				9.88	10.66	90.03	89.79
Statistical test1
Effect	χ2	F-value
Genome (G)	13.38**	0.01	0.04	5.29*	10.41**	0.88	1.34
HG	17.62**	3.52	3.84	0.55	0.32	0.47	0.74

(NM) Number of markers; (ML) map length (cM); (MIL) mean interval length (cM); (CV) coefficient of variation (%) of interval length; (H,L) correspond to H map consisting of mostly dominant markers in which the dominant allele is derived from Triticum dicoccoides accession H52 and L map consisting of mostly dominant markers in which the dominant allele is derived from Triticum durum cultivar Ldn., respectively, in Fig. 1, (WM) weighted mean; (GWM) grand weighted mean. ¹The LOG-linear analysis was used for NM. ANOVA was used for ML, MIL, and CV. (G) Genome; (HG) homoeologous group; (*,**) significant at the 5% and 1% level, respectively.