Table 5.
Recent published overall ADR in sedated patients
| Method or subjects | ADR | Reference |
| Without trainee involvement | 28% | 15 |
| Narrow band imaging | 23% | 16 |
| Male non veterans | 24.4% | 17 |
| High definition colonoscope | 24.7% | 18 |
| Patients in Canada | 25.5% | 19 |
| Patients in Israel | 26% | 20 |
| Withdrawal time >6 min | 28.3% | 21 |
| Three slow endoscopists after monitoring of ADR | 28.9% | 22 |
| High definition colonoscope | 28.8% | 23 |
| Morning colonoscopies | 29.3% | 24 |
| Chromoendoscopy and standard colonoscope | 33.6% | 25 |
| Chromoendoscopy and standard colonoscope | 35.4% | 26 |
| White light and high definition colonoscope | 41% to 57% | 34 |
| Narrow band imaging | 51% | 35 |
| Chromoendoscopy and high definition colonoscope | 55.5% | 34 |