Table 3.
—Main Advantages and Disadvantages of Actigraphy vs Other Sleep Assessment Methods
Sleep Assessment Method | Main Advantages | Main Disadvantages |
Sleep questionnaires | Brief, easily administered in conjunction with clinical interview Low patient burden |
Subject to recall biases Limited usefulness in patients who are unable to self-report reliably (eg, young children, dementia patients) |
Limited validity compared with PSG | ||
Sleep diary | Provides documentation of daily variability | Patient burden higher than questionnaires; requires patient to complete diary each day for maximum validity |
Documents habits in the home sleep environment | Influenced by patient’s expectations about sleep | |
Less recall bias than questionnaires because information is recorded daily | ||
Actigraphy | Provides objective information about daily variability and sleep quality | Limited usefulness in assessment of SOL |
Records information in the home sleep environment | Higher cost than sleep diaries | |
Not influenced by patient expectations, recall bias, or memory impairments | Patients should complete sleep diaries concurrently to enhance quality of information | |
Lower cost than PSG | ||
Laboratory PSG | “Gold standard” objective assessment of sleep | High participant burden |
High cost | ||
Does not provide information on sleep habits at home | ||
Can lead to a “first night effect” phenomenon |
See Table 1 legend for expansion of abbreviations.