Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Relatsh. 2011 Jun;18(2):224–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01358.x

Table 7.

Lagged Correlates of Affect and Social Control

Separate models
Affect, controlling
for social control
Social control,
controlling for affect
Simultaneous models
Lagged variable Coef. t rp Coef. t rp Coef. t rp
Diet adherence, controlling for linear time
Negative affect −0.088 −1.70 −.22 −0.087 −1.56 −.20
Positive affect 0.021 0.50 .07 −0.002 −0.04 −.01
Instrumental SC 0.023 1.12 .15 0.019 0.92 .12
Monitoring SC 0.041 2.05* .26 0.032 1.48 .19
Reinforcing SC 0.022 0.75 .10 0.004 0.13 .02

Exercise behavior (min)
Negative affect 2.17 1.40 .18 2.44 1.52 .20
Positive affect 0.23 0.21 .03 0.99 0.88 .12
Instrumental SC −0.33 −0.49 −.06 −0.43 −0.62 −.08
Monitoring SC 0.70 1.54 .20 1.04 2.38* .30
Reinforcing SC −0.33 −0.45 −.06 −0.97 −1.40 −.18

Note. Coef. = Unstandardized regression coefficient. rp = Partial correlation.

p ≤ .10.

*

p ≤ .05.

**

p ≤ .01.

***

p ≤ .001.