Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;6(6):1266–1273. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09981110

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Relationships (inverse correlation for all) between the natural logarithmic uremic retention solute concentrations and the eGFR according to Stevens et al. (8): (A) SCrea, (B) total IS, (C) total CMPF, and (D) UA. The figure shows the regression lines (solid lines) and the 95% confidence interval (dashed lines).