Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;6(6):1266–1273. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09981110

Table 3.

Linear regression analyses (R2 values) between the natural logarithmic functions of different uremic retention solute concentrations as a function of the eGFR as calculated according to four different methods

MDRD C-G epi-GFR Stevens
SCrea 0.833 0.737 0.737 0.570
SDMA 0.237 0.300 0.309 0.320
ADMA 0.108 0.149 0.167 0.193
UA 0.054 0.062 0.058 0.062
IS Total 0.416 0.426 0.426 0.361
HA Total 0.107 0.141 0.130 0.117
pCS Total 0.150 0.129 0.119 0.085
IAA Total 0.123 0.134 0.132 0.115
CMPF Total 0.035 0.016 0.014 0.009
IS Free 0.265 0.289 0.282 0.257
HA Free 0.122 0.160 0.147 0.134
pCS Free 0.203 0.175 0.164 0.124
IAA Free 0.218 0.257 0.253 0.238

C-G, Cockcroft-Gault; SCrea, serum creatinine; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. All correlations were significant (P <0.05) except total CMPF. R2 values <0.2 are in bold.