Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Jan 1;7962:796206. doi: 10.1117/12.877884

Figure 3.

Figure 3

With 6 raters hired to identify 82 RV insertion points in 41 randomly selected pig heart slices, the analyzed results of 3 of the slices are shown, where the red “x” are all rater decisions, and the green “o” show the MAP Continuous STAPLE fusion comparing to an expert's decision (yellow “x”). In the first image, the fusion corrects the one rater's mistake that has deviated too much. In the second image, fusion brings the result closer to the expert decision than the scattered rater decisions. In the last image, although rater deviations cause the fusion also to deviate, it is still close to the expert decision.