Table 6.
Feature | Description | Score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microscopy | nPCR | Histopathology | Microscopy | nPCR | Histopathology | ||
Personnel | Infrastructure | Simple | Complex | Complex | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Equipment cost | Low | High | Very high | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Training | Simple | Complex | Very complex | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Experience | Very high | High | Very high | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
Cost | Low | High | Very high | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Cost per test (US$) | 1.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
Sample preparation | Simple | Complex | Complex | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Time to a result | 1 hour | 24 hours | > 24 hours | 1 | 24 | 48 | |
Automation | No | Yes | No | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Field application | Yes | No | No | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Single sample testing | Yes | No | Yes | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
Total Score | 12 | 41 | 72 |
See Methods section (Operational and costs assessment) for term definition.
The lowest score allows ranking as the “best” and the highest as the “worst” test.