Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov 11;20(1):23–32. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0698

Table 1.

Results of Associations at Prostate Cancer GWAS Loci in Men of African descent

Sample Size Risk Allele Frequency
Chr Locus SNP Position
(bp)
Risk
Allele
Cases Controls Cases Controls aOR (95% CI)* P-
value
OR in
EDM**
MAF in
EDM**
2 EHBP1 rs721048 62,985,234 A 2083 2116 0.05 0.04 1.02 (0.82 - 1.26) 0.882 1.15(1) 0.19
3 3p12.1 rs2660753 87,193,363 T 1796 1415 0.50 0.49 1.05 (0.95 - 1.17) 0.338 1.18(2) 0.11
6 SLC22A3 rs9364554 160,753,653 T 2652 2659 0.07 0.07 1.05 (0.90 - 1.24) 0.513 1.17(2) 0.29
7 JAZF1 rs10486567 27,943,087 C 2899 2538 0.74 0.71 1.18 (1.08 - 1.29) 0.0002 1.21(3) 0.77
7 LMTK2 rs6465657 97,654,262 C 3266 2631 0.87 0.87 1.03 (0.91 - 1.15) 0.666 1.12(2) 0.46
8 8p21 rs6982080 29,686,860 G 844 536 0.28 0.28 1.08 (0.90 - 1.29) 0.432 1.03(3) 0.31
9 DAB2IP rs1571801 123,467,193 T 1709 1413 0.15 0.14 1.07 (0.92 - 1.24) 0.385 1.30(4) 0.24
10 MSMB rs7920517 51,202,626 G 849 541 0.74 0.71 1.13 (0.93 - 1.36) 0.217 1.22(2) 0.48
10 MSMB rs10993994 51,219,501 T 3374 2982 0.62 0.60 1.12 (1.03 - 1.21) 0.005 1.25(2) 0.4
10 MSMB rs7904463 51,229,474 T 501 563 0.69 0.66 1.13 (0.92 - 1.39) 0.252 1.06(5) 0.67
10 MINPP1 rs12771728 89,345,292 C 850 541 0.19 0.19 1.03 (0.83 - 1.27) 0.788 1.06(3) 0.34
10 CTBP2 rs4962416 126,686,861 G 1202 1388 0.17 0.17 0.99 (0.85 - 1.16) 0.933 1.18(3) 0.27
11 11q13 rs1241845 68,691,994 A 862 876 0.12 0.13 0.94 (0.76 - 1.16) 0.539 1.16(6) 0.28
11 11q13 rs7931342 68,751,072 G 2445 2018 0.79 0.77 1.15 (1.03 - 1.29) 0.014 1.19(2) 0.49
11 11q13.2 rs10896449 68,751,242 G 2056 1898 0.70 0.68 1.12 (1.01 - 1.24) 0.031 1.17(3) 0.28
12 Chr. 12 rs902774 51,560,170 A 849 541 0.09 0.09 1.02 (0.77 - 1.34) 0.914 1.03(2) 0.15
15 IL16 rs4072111 79,365,193 T 857 539 0.04 0.05 0.87 (0.58 - 1.31) 0.509 1.29(3) 0.11
16 CDH13 rs4782726 81,258,833 A 849 535 0.32 0.32 0.99 (0.83 - 1.19) 0.929 1.20(3) 0.18
17 HNF1B rs11649743 33,149,091 C 862 874 0.94 0.93 1.10 (0.83 - 1.45) 0.505 1.28(7) 0.8
17 HNF1B rs4430796 33,172,152 T 3112 2911 0.35 0.33 1.08 (1.00 - 1.18) 0.053 1.22(8) 0.49
17 HNF1B rs7501939 33,175,268 C 1305 1513 0.50 0.50 0.97 (0.87 - 1.09) 0.651 1.19(8) 0.58
19 KLK2/3 rs887391 46,677,463 T 851 875 0.50 0.49 1.03 (0.90 - 1.18) 0.671 1.13(9) 0.76
19 KLK2/3 rs2735839 56,056,434 A 2773 2680 0.32 0.31 1.07 (0.99 - 1.18) 0.093 1.20(2) 0.15
22 22q13 rs9623117 38,782,064 C 987 1077 0.76 0.76 0.99 (0.86 - 1.15) 0.937 1.25(40) 0.21
X NUDT10/11 rs5945572 51,246,422 A 1764 1235 0.31 0.28 1.11 (1.02 - 1.20) 0.02 1.23(1) 0.35
X NUDT10/11 rs5945619 51,258,411 G 1390 1845 0.41 0.36 1.09 (1.00 - 1.18) 0.039 1.19(2) 0.36
*

aOR: per allele OR adjusting for age and study centers.

**

OR (per allele OR) in EDM were estimated from: (a) estimations in the original publications whenever they are available (1,2,5,6,7,8,9,19), (b) recalculations based on number of genotype counts in cases and controls when available(4), (c) Specifically for SNPs reported in Thomas et al. (3), ORs for heterozygous carriers were used as a proxy for aORs when OR for homozygous carriers were higher than OR for heterozygous carriers. For SNPs rs4072111 and rs4782726, increased in prostate cancer risk were only seen in homozygous carriers. Therefore, the square-root of OR in homozygous carriers were used as estimates.