Table 2.
Therapist intention to achieve target threshold
| Bivariate Models |
Multivariate Model |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t-ratio | df | p-value | Percent Variance Explained | B | SE | t-ratio | df | p-value | |
| Condition Assignment | |||||||||||
| Assigned to P4P condition | 1.31 | .30 | 4.35 | 27 | <.001 | 18% | 1.11 | .31 | 3.59 | 27 | .002 |
| Theory of Planned Behavior | |||||||||||
| Attitude | .40 | .13 | 2.97 | 88 | .004 | 9% | .22 | .14 | 1.59 | 86 | .115 |
| Subjective Norms | .23 | .10 | 2.26 | 88 | .026 | 5% | .17 | .10 | 1.66 | 86 | .100 |
| Control | .01 | .11 | 0.08 | 88 | .939 | 0% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Percent Variance Explained = 22% | |||||||||||
Note: All analyses were conducted using HLM software. Assigned to P4P condition was modeled at the site-level (level 2) while the theory of planned behavior measures were modeled at the therapist-level (level 1).