Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 7;17(21):2592–2596. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i21.2592

Table 1.

Endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection therapeutic outcomes

Author Yr n Method Complete resection (%) Local recurrence (%) Bleeding (%) Perforation (%)
Lee 1996 19 Strip biopsy 37.8 28.6
Hyun 1996 20 Strip biopsy
Cheon 2000 28 Strip biopsy 64.3 3.6
Seong 2002 35 Strip biopsy 94.3 6.1
Hyun 2003 45 Strip biopsy 55.6 0.0 24.4 0.0
Kim 2000 20 EMR-L 85.0 5.9 0.0 0.0
Kim 2005 109 Strip biopsy, EMR-C, EMR-P 67.9 1.4 8.3 2.8
Youn 2006 149 Strip biopsy, EMR-C, EMR-L, ESD 84.6 4.0 22.8 1.3
Kim 2007 514 Strip biopsy, EMR-C, EMR-L, EMR-P, ESD 77.6 6.0 13.8 0.6
Jung 2007 360 EMR-P 82.8 10.6 1.1
Min 2009 103 EMR-P 75.7 0.0 3.9 1.9
Jung 2007 264 ESD 87.9 9.8 3.8
Kang 2008 456 ESD 80.3 0.0
Park 2008 434 ESD 77.4 1.8 8.1 2.3
Min 2009 243 ESD 88.9 0.0 5.3 4.5
Chung 2009 534 ESD 87.7 15.6 1.2

EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR-C: EMR by cap-fitted panendoscope; EMR-L: EMR with ligation; EMR-P: Precutting followed by snare resection.