Table 1.
TF | Rank | Correlation (r value)a | Significance level | Program prediction | Documented siteb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knockout lines | |||||
STE12 | 4 | 0.89 | 0.001 | ?TGAAACc | ATGAAA |
BAS1 | 7 | 0.52 | 0.01 | ?GAGTCA | GAGTCA |
PDR3 | 5 | 0.65 | 0.05 | CGCGG?T | TCCG(C,T)GGA |
MET28 | 4 | 0.87 | 0.001 | ?GTCACG | TCACGTG |
GCR1d | 2 | 0.99 | 0.001 | ACCA?CC | C(A,T)TCC |
GCN4d | 38 | 0.50 | 0.01 | TGACTC? | TGANTNe |
Total evaluated: 11 | |||||
Cell cycle (high density arrays) | |||||
MET32 | 2 | 0.99 | 0.001 | CT?TGGC | AACTGTGG |
GCN4 | 2 | 0.95 | 0.001 | CTGAC?C | TGANTNe |
Total evaluated: 6 | |||||
Cell cycle (cDNA arrays) | |||||
PHO4 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.002 | CACG?G | CACGT(T,G) |
Total evaluated: 9 |
Probability that the correlation is different from zero.
Taken from SCPD.
“?” denotes a position where the program allowed any base.
These two did not meet criteria for successful hits.
Approximately one-half of the 20 documented GCN4 binding sites in SCPD contained the sequence TGACTC.