Table 3.
Gene | SAGE tag | Tag count | |
---|---|---|---|
forelimb | hindlimb | ||
Hoxa1 | TCTGTAATAA | 0 | 1 |
Hoxa7 | AAGTGGAAGA | 1 | 1 |
Hoxa9 | AAACTGCTCT | 5 | 2 |
Hoxa10 | CATAAAAGGG | 13 | 10 |
Hoxa11 | TGAAATAATA | 0 | 1 |
Hoxa11, antisense1 | CAATTGAGGC | 9 | 7 |
Hoxa11, antisense1 | CATCAGGGTA | 0 | 4 |
Hoxa132 | GTGGATTAAC | 2 | 4 |
Hoxb8 | CGCGCTGTGA | 0 | 1 |
Hoxc9 | TACGGCTCGC | 0 | 2 |
Hoxc103 | TAGCTTCCTT | 0 | 4 |
CAAAGTTGAG | 0 | 5 | |
Hoxc114 | TGCGTGAGTG | 0 | 1 |
Hoxd105 | TTTCTGAAAA | 1 | 0 |
Hoxd11 | AGTCACTGTC | 17 | 15 |
Hoxd132 | GGCCTCTCAG | 6 | 3 |
Unless otherwise noted, all SAGE tags in this table were initially identified by the ehmtag-mapping method and subsequently verified manually.1There are numerous polyadenylated antisense transcripts produced from this locus (Hsieh-Li et al. 1995). Both of these SAGE tags are valid matches to different antisense transcripts.
The SAGE tags for these genes were identified by cloning and sequencing the 3′ ends of the genes.
Obtained from an analysis of GenBank sequence data (GI:51413). There are two different poly(A) signals that would generate the two different SAGE tags listed here, the second of which was generated from an ATTAA poly(A) signal and poly(A) rich region 1 kb upstream (at 5752 bp) of the reported putative poly(A) signal (Peterson et al. 1992).
Obtained from the sequence presented in Figure 1 of Hostikka and Capecchi (1998).
This SAGE tag was identified from a genomic clone (see Methods for details).