Skip to main content
. 2001 Nov;11(11):1944–1951. doi: 10.1101/gr.200401

Table 1.

Reproducibility of Retention Times

Run no.Peak Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4





1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
















1 7.50 7.74 8.53 8.88 5.33 5.69 6.31 6.37 5.15 5.45 6.11 6.35 7.45 7.64 8.15 8.58
2 7.60 7.68 8.47 8.81 5.63 5.83 6.43 6.73 5.37 5.57 6.28 6.63 7.78 7.91 8.48 8.87
3 7.67 7.80 8.31 8.67 5.49 5.74 6.33 6.65 5.15 5.28 5.91 6.25 7.88 7.98 8.57 8.91
4 7.61 7.68 8.11 8.63 5.60 5.82 6.38 6.67 5.41 5.62 6.18 6.42 7.82 7.92 8.53 8.91
5 7.67 7.73 8.09 8.57 5.58 5.83 6.41 6.75 5.27 5.48 6.12 6.43 7.87 8.00 8.27 8.58
6 7.58 7.58 8.01 8.45 5.61 5.94 6.55 6.81 5.15 5.43 6.10 6.36 7.81 7.96 8.46 8.90
Mean 7.61 7.70 8.25 8.67 5.54 5.81 6.40 6.66 5.25 5.47 6.12 6.41 7.77 7.90 8.41 8.79
SD 0.06 0.07 0.22 0.16 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.16 0.16
RSD 0.83 0.97 2.62 1.81 2.05 1.48 1.34 2.32 2.26 2.17 1.99 1.98 2.07 1.68 1.95 1.87

Reproducibility of retention times in minutes of the four heteroduplex peaks on a four-column array with four individual resistance ovens at an effective column temperature of 55°C over six runs. Experimental conditions as described in Figure 2b.