Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2009 Sep 3;393(4):993–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.062

Table 3.

Percent of matching base pairs between the ligand-binding domains of the computationally predicted average structure (see Methods) and experimentally derived structure. Asterisks (*) denote experimental structures published using mfold.43

Riboswitch Name (Sequence) Percent matching structural elements
tenA, B. subtilis thi-box 11* 99%
ypaA, B. subtilis RFN element18 65%
ribD, B. subtilis RFN element18 62%
gcvT, B.subtilis22 64%
VCI-II, V. cholera22 81%
btuB, E. coli B12 box59 62%
thiM, E. coli thi-box4 83%