Purpose of using outcome measures in clinical care/audit |
n = 254 |
n = 86 |
|
To assess patients' symptoms/needs/problems |
234 (92.1%) |
77 (89.5%) |
|
To monitor changes in patients' health status or quality of life |
180 (70.9%) |
58 (67.4%) |
|
To evaluate the effect of an intervention/care/service |
172 (67.7%) |
68 (79.1%) |
|
To facilitate communication in the team |
117 (46.1%) |
35 (40.7%) |
|
To document patients' characteristics |
116 (45.7%) |
37 (43.0%) |
|
To assess families' needs/problems |
111 (43.7%) |
51 (59.3%) |
|
To facilitate communication with patients/families |
85 (33.5%) |
40 (46.5%) |
|
To assess the care given against standards (in audit) |
59 (23.2%) |
45 (52.3%) |
|
Other, please state |
9 (3.5%) |
12 (14.0%) |
|
Advantages of using outcome measures |
n = 233 |
n = 78 |
|
To better understand patients' and families' needs (e.g. assessment, screening) |
186 (79.8%) |
72 (92.3%) |
|
To improve the quality of care for patients and families |
172 (73.8%) |
72 (92.3%) |
|
To make decisions regarding treatment/care |
170 (73.0%) |
73 (93.6%) |
|
To communicate in the team |
147 (63.1%) |
56 (71.8%) |
|
To evaluate services |
121 (51.9%) |
64 (82.1%) |
|
To communicate with the patients and families |
102 (43.8%) |
58 (74.4%) |
|
Other, please state |
16 (6.9%) |
14 (17.9%) |