Skip to main content
. 2011 May 14;11:317. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-317

Table 3.

Group comparisons on attitude measures

Scale Diabetes
Group
(N = 298)
Mental
Illness
Group
(N = 356)
ANOVA F ANCOVA F
Care & Support 3.56 (.68) 3.41 (.71) 7.86 (p < .01) 6.63 (p < .05)
Avoidance 2.50 (.59) 2.64 (.57) 8.59 (p < .01) 7.58 (p < .01)
Mistrust 2.88 (.85) 2.98 (.82) 2.03 ns 2.60 ns
Negative Stereotypes 3.23 (.66) 3.39 (.60) 10.04 (p < .01) 10.29 (p < .01)

ns = not significant;

Significant covariate effects and direction of effects:

Care & Support: higher general stigma (F(1, 645) = 15.08, p < .0005); is a nurse (F(1, 645) = 68.89, p < .0005); is female (F(1, 645) = 4.70, p < .05);

Avoidance: higher general stigma (F(1, 645) = 35.09, p < .0005); is a not a nurse (F(1, 645) = 22.59, p < .0005);

Mistrust: higher general stigma (F(1, 645) = 32.58, p < .0005); more MH work experience (F(1, 645) = 4.01, p = .046)

Negative Stereotypes: higher general stigma (F(1, 645) = 36.47, p < .0005); is a nurse (F(1, 645) = 15.15, p < .0005).