Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2011 Jul;15(5):938–948. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9784-y

Table 2.

Sensitivity analysis on potential risk behavior change and protective circumcision effect: total infections prevented and percentage of cumulative infections prevented after 20 years by various 5-year expanded circumcision programsa

Protective effect on HIV transmission due to circumcision

Change in condom use post-circumcisionb 20(%)c 40(%)c 60(%)c 80(%)c
Programs with 10% coverage goals
  Condom use increases by 100% 145,000 (49) 126,000 (47) 107,000 (43) 87,000 (39)
  Condom use increases by 50% 87,000 (30) 81,000 (30) 74,000 (30) 66,000 (30)
  Condom use increases by 25% 51,000 (17) 53,000 (20) 54,000 (22)d 54,000 (25)
  No change in condom use 11,000 (4) 21,000 (8) 32,000 (13)d 41,000 (19)
  Condom use decreases by 25% [34,000 (12)] [14,000 (5)] 7,000 (3)d 27,000 (12)
  Condom use decreases by 50% [83,000 (28)] [53,000 (20)] [21,000 (8)] 12,000 (5)
  Condom use decreases by 100% [186,000 (63)] [139,000 (51)] [84,000 (34)] [23,000 (11)]
Programs with 20% coverage goals
  Condom use increases by 100% 175,000 (59) 158,000 (58) 139,000 (57) 119,000 (54)
  Condom use increases by 50% 109,000 (37) 106,000 (39) 102,000 (41) 96,000 (44)
  Condom use increases by 25% 67,000 (23) 73,000 (27) 79,000 (32)d 83,000 (38)
  No change in condom use 18,000 (6) 36,000 (13) 52,000 (21)d 68,000 (31)
  Condom use decreases by 25% [37,000 (13)] [7,000 (3)] 23,000 (9)d 51,000 (23)
  Condom use decreases by 50% [97,000 (33)] [55,000 (20)] [10,000 (4)] 33,000 (15)
  Condom use decreases by 100% [222,000 (75)] [161,000 (59)] [87,000 (35)] [9,000 (4)]
a

Total infections prevented for male and female populations. Percentages reflect the proportion of expected infections prevented by each program scenario. Numbers in brackets represent negative values, which indicate the number and percentage of additional infections caused by a particular program

b

Considering an increase or decrease from baseline condom use levels of 50%. A 25% difference implies an absolute increase to 62.5% or decrease to 37.5% in condom use levels. A 50% difference implies an absolute increase to 75% or decrease to 25% in condom use levels. A 100% difference implies an absolute increase to 100% or decrease to 0% in condom use levels

c

Total expected infections over 20 years for various circumcision protective effects in the absence of expanded circumcision programs: 295,000 (20); 271,000 (40); 246,000 (60); and 220,000 (80%)

d

Outcomes for these simulations are examined in further detail in Fig. 2, which demonstrates infections prevented over time and stratified by gender for each of these scenarios