Skip to main content
. 2011 May 13;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-8-35

Table 1.

Summary of comparative flow cytometric binding assays performed using soluble SU proteins of FeLV-A/61E, 61E/945-VRB or mutant FeLV-A/61E SU proteins substituted of specific amino acids within and surrounding the consensus VRB domain of FeLV-945

Soluble SU Proteina Average GMF of Replicate Binding Assaysb Comparable Binding Phenotype
FeLV-A/61E 12.49 N/A

61E/945-VRB 22.67 N/A

VRB3aa 8.64 FeLV-A/61E

N147S 12.16 FeLV-A/61E

K128N/S130T 11.92 FeLV-A/61E

I156V/K164R 10.09 FeLV-A/61E

K128N/S130T/I186V 22.65 61E/945-VRB

I156V/K164R/I186V 21.69 61E/945-VRB

aComparative flow cytometric binding assays were performed using FeLV-A/61E, 61E/945-VRB, or mutated SU proteins named according to the individual FeLV-945 amino acid residues substituted into FeLV-A/61E as shown in Figure 7C. Binding assays were performed using equivalent mass amounts of each SU protein and feline 3201 cells.

bThe average geometric mean fluorescence (GMF) is shown for three (N147S), four (VRB3aa, I156V/K164R, K128N/S130T, I156V/K164R/I186V), or five (K128N/S130T/I186V) replicate binding assays using three or four independently generated and titered batches of SU proteins.