Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3

ADDITIONAL SUMMARY OF FINDINGS [Explanation]

Acupoint P6 stimulation versus sham to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting
Patient or population: patients with a desire to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting
Settings: Surgery
Intervention: Acupoint P6 stimulation versus antiemetic
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of Participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Acupoint P6 stimulation versus sham
Nausea - All antiemetics combined Low risk population1 RR 0.82
(0.6 to 1.13)
660
(9)
⊕⊕⊕○
moderate2
100 per 1000 82 per 1000
(60 to 113)
High risk population1
400 per 1000 328 per 1000
(240 to 452)
Vomiting - All antiemetics combined Low risk population1 RR 1.01
(0.77 to 1.31)
1036
(14)
⊕⊕⊕○
moderate2
100 per 1000 101 per 1000
(77 to 131)
High risk population1
400 per 1000 404 per 1000
(308 to 524)
Rescue antiemetic Medium risk population RR 0.82
(0.59 to 1.13)
527
(7)
⊕⊕⊕○
moderate2
180 per 1000 148 per 1000
(106 to 203)
Adverse effects3 633 per 1000 298 per 1000
(165 to 551)
RR 0.47
(0.26 to 0.87)
60
(1)
*

The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidance

High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1

No risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting typically have control rates of 10%; most studies in this systematic review had high risk patients with two or more risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting, therefore we assumed a risk of 40%.

2

Total number of events is less than 300

3

Restlessness was more frequent after droperidol group than after acupuncture.