Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Relatsh. 2011 Jun 1;18(2):198–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01353.x

Table 1.

Relational Uncertainty Predicting Changes in Cortisol Over Time in Study 1

Combined Model Self Uncertainty Partner Uncertainty Relationship Uncertainty
Baseline Cortisol .127** (.045) .144*** (.044) .141** (.043) .126** (.038)
 Sex .010 (.018) .008 (.018) .005 (.018) .010 (.018)
 Self-reported Hurt −.012 (.008) −.008 (.008) −.007 (.008) −.009 (.007)
 Self Uncertainty −.022 (.022) −.024 (.014)
 Partner Uncertainty .009 (.014) .023 (.013)
 Relationship Uncertainty .045 (.026) .035* (.017)
Linear Slope −.020* (.010) −.015 (.010) −.022* (.009) −.020* (.009)
 Sex −.007 (.004) −.006 (.004) −.006 (.004) −.005 (.004)
 Self-reported Hurt .004* (.002) .004* (.002) .004* (.002) .004* (.002)
 Self Uncertainty −.008* (.001) −.003 (.004)
 Partner Uncertainty .010* (.005) .008* (.004)
 Relationship Uncertainty .002 (.007) .005 (.004)

Note: The dependent variable in the model is cortisol, which is measured in micrograms per deciliter (μg/dL). Cell entries are model coefficients; parenthetical values are standard errors. Sex is coded 0 = males, 1 = females and is grand mean centered.

< .10,

*

< .05,

**

< .01,

***

< .001.