Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul;8(4):198–208. doi: 10.1101/lm.40001

Table 1.

Effect of Number of Acquisition Trials, CS, and US Strength

Exp. no.
CS
US
Conditioning trials
Retention tests
N
Comments
% PER acquisition
Early LTM % PER
Late LTM % PER
Test groups
massed
spaced
massed
spaced
massed
spaced
1 carnation 1.25 m 5 48% 81% 36% 72% 29% 86% same 62
2 propionic acid 1.25 m 5 73% 86% 50% 81% 35% 81% same 99
3 propionic acid 1.25 m 5 23% 45% 20% 50% 11% 52% same 77
4 propionic acid 1.25 m 5 62% 90% 48% 90% 45% 96% same 58
5 propionic acid 1.25 m 5 60% 64% 20% 79% 10% 86% same 24
6 hexanol 1.25 m 5 54% 79% 46% 87% 44% 82% same 121
7 hexanol 0.5 m 5 59% 71% 59% 79% 59% 88% same 58
8 hexanol 2.5 m 5 59% 93% 50% 78% 56% 100% same 59
9 carnation 1.25 m 5 72% 97% 48% 81% different 60 only early
 LTM tested
10 carnation 1.25 m 5 7% 64% 29% 68% different 39 only late
 LTM tested
11 propionic acid 1.25 m 8 29% 70% 19% 43% different 59
25% 100% 39% 86%
12 hexanol 1.25 m 12 21% 52% 46% 65% different 51 only late
 LTM tested
13 mechanical 1.25 m 8 53% 75% 53% 56% different 59
 stimulus 63% 83% 31% 75%
14 infrared 1.25 m 8 47% 59% 43% 50% different 89
 stimulus 51% 57% 30% 60%
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure