Table 1.
Effect of Number of Acquisition Trials, CS, and US Strength
Exp. no.
|
CS
|
US
|
Conditioning trials
|
Retention tests
|
N
|
Comments
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% PER acquisition
|
Early LTM % PER
|
Late LTM % PER
|
Test groups
|
|||||||||
massed
|
spaced
|
massed
|
spaced
|
massed
|
spaced
|
|||||||
1 | carnation | 1.25 m | 5 | 48% | 81% | 36% | 72% | 29% | 86% | same | 62 | |
2 | propionic acid | 1.25 m | 5 | 73% | 86% | 50% | 81% | 35% | 81% | same | 99 | |
3 | propionic acid | 1.25 m | 5 | 23% | 45% | 20% | 50% | 11% | 52% | same | 77 | |
4 | propionic acid | 1.25 m | 5 | 62% | 90% | 48% | 90% | 45% | 96% | same | 58 | |
5 | propionic acid | 1.25 m | 5 | 60% | 64% | 20% | 79% | 10% | 86% | same | 24 | |
6 | hexanol | 1.25 m | 5 | 54% | 79% | 46% | 87% | 44% | 82% | same | 121 | |
7 | hexanol | 0.5 m | 5 | 59% | 71% | 59% | 79% | 59% | 88% | same | 58 | |
8 | hexanol | 2.5 m | 5 | 59% | 93% | 50% | 78% | 56% | 100% | same | 59 | |
9 | carnation | 1.25 m | 5 | 72% | 97% | 48% | 81% | — | — | different | 60 | only early |
LTM tested | ||||||||||||
10 | carnation | 1.25 m | 5 | 7% | 64% | — | — | 29% | 68% | different | 39 | only late |
LTM tested | ||||||||||||
11 | propionic acid | 1.25 m | 8 | 29% | 70% | 19% | 43% | — | — | different | 59 | |
25% | 100% | — | — | 39% | 86% | |||||||
12 | hexanol | 1.25 m | 12 | 21% | 52% | — | — | 46% | 65% | different | 51 | only late |
LTM tested | ||||||||||||
13 | mechanical | 1.25 m | 8 | 53% | 75% | 53% | 56% | — | — | different | 59 | |
stimulus | 63% | 83% | — | — | 31% | 75% | ||||||
14 | infrared | 1.25 m | 8 | 47% | 59% | 43% | 50% | — | — | different | 89 | |
stimulus | 51% | 57% | — | — | 30% | 60% |