Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 13;6(6):e19557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019557

Table 1. Correlation between Extranodal Metastasis and clinicopathological factors in gastric carcinoma patients with potential radical resection.

Variable Extranodal Metastasis P value
Positive (%)N = 179 Negative (%)N = 1164
Gender 0.426
Male 125 (13.9) 777 (86.1)
Female 54 (12.2) 387 (87.8)
Age (year) 0.674
<60 97 (12.8) 662 (87.2)
≥60 82 (14.0) 502 (86.0)
Tumor location <0.001
Proximal 96 (13.3) 628 (86.7)
Distal 62 (10.9) 505 (89.1)
Total 21 (40.4) 31 (59.6)
Tumor size (cm) <0.001
≤5.0 78 (9.8) 714 (90.2)
>5.0 101 (18.3) 450 (81.7)
Histological grade <0.001
Well/Moderately differentiated (G1+G2) 38 (7.6) 465 (92.4)
Poorly differentiated (G3) 97 (16.9) 476 (83.1)
Undifferentiated (G4) 44 (16.5) 223 (83.5)
Lymphatic/Venous invasion <0.001
No 146 (11.8) 1096 (88.2)
Yes 33 (32.7) 68 (67.3)
Depth of invasion (AJCC 7th edition) <0.001
T1 0 (0) 118 (100.0)
T2 4 (2.3) 167 (97.7)
T3 31 (12.2) 223 (87.8)
T4a 120 (17.8) 555 (82.2)
T4b 24 (19.2) 101 (80.8)
Nodal status (AJCC 7th edition) <0.001
N0 24 (5.2) 440 (94.8)
N1 37 (13.9) 230 (86.1)
N2 43 (13.1) 285 (86.9)
N3 75 (26.4) 209 (73.6)
TNM staging (AJCC 7th edition) <0.001
Stage I 2 (1.0) 190 (99.0)
Stage II 36 (8.8) 372 (91.2)
Stage III 141 (19.0) 602 (81.0)