Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;57(6):e216–e227.

Table 4.

Multivariate logistic regression on the hope to enter FM among students from the preclinical sample: N = 612; 149 observations were deleted owing to missing data for the independent variables; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.43.

COVARIATE FM N = 196 OS N = 416 ODDS RATIO (WALD 95% CI)
Median (range) age, y 24 (19–43) 23 (20–40) 1.07 (1.00–1.14)
Sex, n (%)
  • Male (reference) 52 (26.5) 165 (39.7) −1.14 (0.71–1.82)
  • Female 44 (73.5) 251 (60.3)
Environment before university, n (%)
  • Urban (reference) 76 (38.8) 242 (58.2) -
  • Rural 41 (20.9) 50 (12.0) 2.62 (1.43–4.78)
  • Small town 61 (31.1) 89 (21.4) 1.54 (0.93–2.53)
  • Mix 18 (9.2) 35 (8.4) 1.67 (0.78–3.56)
Hope to be involved in research, n (%)
  • No (reference) 113 (57.7) 133 (32.0) -
  • Yes 22 (11.2) 166 (39.9) 0.23 (0.10–0.52)
  • Unsure 61 (31.1) 117 (28.1) 0.56 (0.34–0.91)
Hope to be involved in public health, n (%)
  • No (reference) 44 (22.4) 142 (34.1) -
  • Yes 84 (42.9) 114 (27.4) 3.33 (1.91–5.82)
  • Unsure 68 (34.7) 160 (38.5) 1.42 (0.83–2.45)
Factor for a satisfying medical practice: flexible work hours, n (%)
  • No (reference) 47 (24.0) 144 (34.6) −1.86 (1.16–2.96)
  • Yes 149 (76.0) 272 (65.4)
Factor for a satisfying medical practice: research opportunities, n (%)
  • No (reference) 176 (89.8) 269 (64.7) -
  • Yes 20 (10.2) 147 (35.3) 0.42 (0.19–0.93)
Short residency program to pay off debt, n (%)
  • No (reference) 136 (69.4) 391 (94.0)
  • Yes 60 (30.6) 25 (6.0) 8.82 (4.49–17.33)
Specialty with high earning potential to pay off debt, n (%)
  • No (reference) 184 (93.9) 296 (71.2) -
  • Yes 12 (6.1) 120 (28.8) −0.07 (0.03–0.16)

CI—confidence interval, FM–family medicine specialty, OS—other specialty.