. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 14.

Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1390–1402. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20096

Table 2.

Behavioral Results

	(a) Based on ‘‘Old’’ Items		(b) Based on “Old” Responses		(c) RT

	Y	O	Y	O	Y	O
LC
Targets	0.26 (0.10)	0.24 (0.09)	0.23 (0.07)	0.22 (0.11)	1.48 (0.14)	1.80 (0.18)
Related lures	0.32 (0.14)	0.27 (0.12)	0.15 (0.05)	0.12 (0.06)	1.53 (0.17)	1.81 (0.18)
Unrelated lures	0.15 (0.11)	0.13 (0.08)	0.07 (0.04)	0.06 (0.03)	1.54 (0.23)	1.88 (0.25)
HC
Targets	0.48 (0.16)	0.48 (0.12)	0.44 (0.01)	0.45 (0.11)	1.21 (0.14)	1.43 (0.19)
Related lures	0.18 (0.14)	0.28 (0.16)	0.09 (0.04)	0.13 (0.05)	1.29 (0.16)	1.56 (0.23)
Unrelated lures	0.04 (0.05)	0.04 (0.04)	0.02 (0.02)	0.02 (0.01)	1.23 (0.70)	1.55 (0.49)

LC = low confidence; HC = high confidence; RT = reaction time; Y = young; O = old; bolded scores represent a significant age difference (p < .05); mean and standard deviations are reported.