Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 19;49(2):215–240. doi: 10.1007/s11024-011-9167-1

Table 3.

Overview of the changing contract for academic chemistry (adapted from Hessels et al. 2009)

Summary of identity Most dominant rationales Most important conditions
1950s and 1960s Basic research

Education

Cultural value

Autonomy

Unconditional funding

SON communities

1970s + Useful knowledge + Problem solving potential + Social accountability
1980s Applicable knowledge Technological innovation

+ Conditional funding

+ Application-oriented funding (STW, IOP, contract research)

+ Foresight

+ Scarcity of resources

Reorganization NWO

1990s Strategic knowledge + Sustainable development

Further prioritization

+ Performance assessments

2000+ + Valorization + Innovation system

+ Consortia (ACTS, TTI, BSIK)

+ European FPs

+ signs indicate that these elements complement rather than replace existing elements

ACTS: Advanced Chemical Technologies for Sustainability; BSIK: Besluit Subsidies Investeringen Kennisinfrastructuur Programs; IOP: Innovation Oriented Program; NWO: Dutch organization for Scientific Research; TTI: Technological Top Institutes; SON: Chemical Research Netherlands; STW: Technology Foundation