. 2008 Apr 8;24(2):224–236. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn014

Table II.

Diet stage transition comparisons for PC on 13 TTM constructs: Study 1

Construct	Observed ES (ω²)	95% CI about ω²		Predicted ES from Smoking	Agreement with smoking predictions	Predicted ES from diet	Agreement with diet prediction	Revised prediction for diet
Construct	Observed ES (ω²)	Lower	Upper	Predicted ES from Smoking	Agreement with smoking predictions	Predicted ES from diet	Agreement with diet prediction	Revised prediction for diet
Part I. Comparing stable PC (PC to PC; N = 208) versus progressing one stage (PC to C; N = 93)
Temptation	0.017	0	0.053	None	✓	Small	✓	*
Pros	0.001	0	0.024	Small	✓	Small	✓	None
Cons	0.024	0.001	0.064	None	✓	Small	✓	*
CR	0.011	0	0.043	None	✓	Small	✓	*
DR	0.009	0	0.040	None	✓	Small	✓	*
ER	0	0	0.016	None	✓	None	✓	*
SO	0.004	0	0.029	Small	✓	None	✓	*
SR	0.023	0.001	0.063	Small	✓	Small	✓	*
CC	0.021	0	0.059	None	✓	Small	✓	*
HR	0.002	0	0.025	None	✓	None	✓	*
RM	0.025	0.002	0.065	None	✓	None	✓	Small
SC	0.005	0	0.033	None	✓	None	✓	*
SL	0.003	0	0.027	None	✓	None	✓	*
Confirmed					13		13
Part II. Comparing stable PC (PC to PC; N = 208) versus progressing two stages (PC to PR; N = 89)
Temptations	0.025	0.001	0.065	None	✓	Small	✓	*
Pros	0.007	0	0.036	Small	✓	Small	✓	*
Cons	0	0	0.013	None	✓	None	✓	*
CR	0.015	0	0.050	Medium		Medium		Small
DR	0.013	0	0.047	Medium		Medium		Small
ER	0.003	0	0.028	Medium		Small	✓	*
SO	0.003	0	0.028	Small	✓	Small	✓	*
SR	0.035	0.006	0.080	Medium	✓	Medium	✓	*
CC	0.023	0.001	0.062	Small	✓	Medium	✓	Small
HR	0.003	0	0.027	Small	✓	Small	✓	None
RM	0.017	0	0.053	Small	✓	Medium		Small
SC	0.001	0	0.023	Small	✓	Small	✓	None
SL	0.028	0.003	0.070	Medium	✓	Medium	✓	Small
Confirmed					10		10
Part III. Comparing stable PC (PC to PC; N = 208) versus progressing three or more stages (PC to A/M; N = 144)
Temptations	0.008	0	0.036	Large		None	✓	*
Pros	0	0	0	Small		None	✓	*
Cons	0.003	0	0.026	Medium		None	✓	*
CR	0.103	0.054	0.160	None		Medium	✓	*
DR	0.050	0.016	0.096	None		Small	✓	*
ER	0.026	0.003	0.065	None	✓	Small	✓	*
SO	0.064	0.025	0.113	None		Medium	✓	*
SR	0.099	0.051	0.155	Small	✓	Medium	✓	*
CC	0.079	0.036	0.132	Small	✓	Medium	✓	*
HR	0.011	0	0.041	None	✓	Small	✓	*
RM	0.019	0.000	0.053	Small	✓	Small	✓	*
SC	0.066	0.027	0.117	Small	✓	Medium	✓	*
SL	0.125	0.072	0.185	Medium	✓	Medium	✓	*
Confirmed					7		13

Consciousness raising (CR), dramatic relief (DR), environmental reevaluation (ER), social-liberation (SO), self-reevaluation (SR), counter conditioning (CC), helping relationships (HR), reinforcement management (RM), stimulus control (SC) and self-liberation (SL). ω² < 0 were set to 0; effect size (ES): small ES 0.01; medium ES 0.059; large ES 0.139; ✓ indicates agreement with initial prediction. *No revisions made to ES diet-based prediction. Proposed revised predictions are based on results as well as cross-sectional data from a separate sample.