Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Nutr. 2011 Feb 3;30(4):443–449. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.001

Table 3.

Serum levels of linoleic acid and conjugated linoleic acid with SAF and CLA supplementation

Supplementation Period 1 Supplementation Period 2 Trend within Treatment* Comparison of
Treatments
Baseline
(Week 0)
Δ (week 16 -
week 0)
Baseline
(Week 0)
Δ (week 16 -
week 0)
½(Δ period 1) +
½(Δ period 2)
P-Value P-Value
Linoleic Acid (% of total fatty acids) 0.0889
SAF 24.2±0.9 2.7±0.9 24.2±1.1 2.9±1.3 2.8±0.8 0.0004
CLA 23.1±1.2 2.9±1.2 25.6±0.9 −1.1±0.9 0.9±0.8 0.2320

c9t11-CLA (% of total fatty acids) < 0.0001
SAF 0.8±0.2 0.09±0.2 0.7±0.2 −0.02±0.3 0.03±0.2 0.8387
CLA 0.9±0.2 0.3±0.3 0.6±0.1 1.0±0.2 0.6±0.2 < 0.0001

t10c12-CLA (% of total fatty acids)
SAF 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(0.0, 0.0) (0.0, 0.0) (0.0, 0.0) (0.0, 0.0)
CLA 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.6
(0.0, 0.0) (0.1, 0.4) (0.0, 0.0) (0.3, 0.7)

Subjects were treated with either SAF or CLA for 16 weeks (Supplementation Period 1), and then crossed over to the other treatment for 16 weeks (Supplementation Period 2). Results were derived from tests for orthogonal contrasts used in the mixed-effects model. Values are LSM ± SE, pooled across SAF and CLA groups for linoleic acid and c9t11-CLA. Analysis for t10c12-CLA was done using the Sign test, and data are presented as median (95% CI). Values are expressed as a percentage of total fatty acid content of the serum for each subject.

*

Within-treatment effect of supplementation periods (final – initial value).

Between-treatment effect (SAF compared with CLA).