Table 2.
Comparison of the taxonomic assignments obtained (using SPHINX algorithm) for sequences specific to malnourished and healthy samples (at the taxonomic level of order)
| % of sequences assigned | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order Name | Malnourished sample (X) | Healthy Sample (Y) | Relative Ratio (X/Y) | Inference |
| Campylobacterales | 78.87 | 0.06 | 1235.57 | High in malnourished |
| Clostridiales | 11.4 | 0.1 | 119.1 | High in malnourished |
| Lactobacillales | 0.79 | 3.19 | 0.25 | High in healthy |
| Enterobacteriales | 0.11 | 5.07 | 0.02 | High in healthy |
| Pseudomonadales | 0.04 | 5.27 | 0.01 | High in healthy |
| Chloroflexales | 0.02 | 4.44 | 0 | High in healthy |
| Desulfurovibrionales | 0 | 4.44 | 0 | High in healthy |
| Bifidobacteriales | 0 | 6.98 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Xanthomonadales | 0 | 3.21 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Plantomycetales | 0 | 2.13 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Halobacteriales | 0 | 12.24 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Actinomycetales | 0 | 19.72 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Burkholderiales | 0 | 19.39 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Rhizobiales | 0 | 2.39 | N.A | High in healthy |