Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2011 Jul;17(7):789–797. doi: 10.1002/lt.22288

Table 2.

Cox Regression Models for Patient Survival*

Predictor A2ALL & Non-A2ALL Combined
A2ALL Only
Non-A2ALL Only
Hazard Ratio P-value 95% Confidence Limits Interaction w/Center Type P-value Hazard Ratio P-value 95% Confidence Limits Hazard Ratio P-value 95% Confidence Limits

LDLT case ≤15 1.61 <.0001 1.28 – 2.02 0.04 2.24 <.0001 1.71 – 2.94 1.45 0.005 1.12 – 1.87
Donor age per 10 yr 1.13 0.0002 1.06 – 1.20 0.23 1.22 0.009 1.05 – 1.41 1.10 0.006 1.03 – 1.18
Recipient age per 10 yr 1.20 0.0003 1. 09 – 1.33 0.11 1.38 0.001 1.14 – 1.66 1.15 0.006 1.04 – 1.27
Serum creatinine (ln) 1.52 <.0001 1.26 – 1.83 0.48 1.78 0.001 1.28 – 2.46 1.45 0.0007 1.17 – 1.79
Diagnosis of HCV 1.18 0.026 1.02 – 1.37 0.57 1.24 0.20 0.89 – 1.72 1.15 0.09 0.98 – 1.35
Diagnosis of HCC 2.12 <.0001 1.68 – 2.69 0.52 1.86 0.013 1.15 – 3.02 2.30 <.0001 1.77 – 2.95
Recipient medical condition: 0.39
ICU vs home 2.52 <.0001 1.87 – 3.41 0.18 1.53 0.19 0.81 – 2.87 2.89 <.0001 2.02 – 2.99
Hospitalized (no ICU) vs home 1.62 <.0001 1.32 – 1.98 0.64 1.36 0.19 0.86 – 2.16 1.67 <.0001 1.32 – 4.14
Cold ischemia time > 4.5hours¤ 1.79 0.0006 1.28 – 2.50 0.34 2.15 0.006 1.24 – 3.73 1.77 0.010 1.15 – 2.73
*

Adjusted for center clustering using robust variances based on the sandwich estimator for Cox regression.

Variables tested but not significant included recipient weight, dialysis, ascites, donor weight, donor’s biological relationship to recipient, and transplant year.

Interactions were tested one at a time in models including all main effects listed as predictors in the table above.

¤

Results for CIT are based on separate models with a smaller sample size because of missing CIT values in 33% of cases.