Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 18;25(7):2117–2124. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1506-z

Table 4.

Comparison with previously published experiences with single-minimal-incision adrenalectomy

Kageyama et al. [21] Hirano et al. [19] Castellucci et al. [17] Cindolo et al. [18] Walz and Alesina [20] Current study
No. of patients 30 54 1 1 5 19
Tumor size: cm (range) 2.7 (0.5–6.5) 2.6 (0.5–4.5) 4.5 4.0 2.9 (1.0–4.0) 2.4 (1.6–4.0)
BMI 24.1(17.3–28.8) 24.5 ± 3.6 29.7 29.6 (22.8–36.5)
Approach Lateral retroperitoneal Lateral retroperitoneal Lateral transperitoneal Lateral transperitoneal Posterior retroperitoneal Lateral retroperitoneal
Length of incision: cm (range) 5.6 (3–9) 4.5 2.0 3.0 1.5 2.7 (2.5–3.0)
Operation time: min (range) 147 (83–240) 203 (92–320) 120 240 54 (35–70) 61.6 (38–120)
EBL: ml (range) 139 (5–470) 252 (10–1700) 125 20 <20 53.2 (5–200)
Comments Gasless, portless endoscopic Gasless, via a 4-cm-diameter and 13.7-cm-length rectoscope Three 5-mm ports inserted through a single incision First case of an adrenalectomy with a single multilumen port Two-port single-incision, with one surgeon handling the camera and one instrument

Data are given as the means and range