Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 15;50(7):1280–1287. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker020

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study participants

Variables Total sample (n = 180)
Age, mean (s.d.), years 51.1 (15.2)
Gender: female, n (%) 148 (82.2)
Race, n (%)
    White 122 (67.8)
    African-American 13 (7.2)
    Asian 21 (11.7)
    Others 16 (8.9)
Education, n (%)a
    Less than or equal to high-school graduate 30 (16.8)
    Some college 62 (34.8)
    College graduate 38 (21.4)
    Graduate degree 86 (48.4)
Type of SSc, n (%)b
    Limited 90 (50.9)
    Diffuse 71 (40.1)
    Overlap 11 (6.2)
    Swollen joint count (0–12) 0.2 (0.8)
    Tender joint count (0–12) 1.2 (2.4)
Patient global (categorical)
    Excellent/very good 24 (13.3)
    Good 69 (38.3)
    Fair/poor 87 (48.3)
Pain over past 7 days (0–10)
Clinical status worsening over past 1 month
    Gastrointestinal symptoms 72 (40.5)
    Skin thickening 49 (27.2)
    Digital ulcers 62 (34.6)
    Dyspnoea 65 (36.1)
MRSS, mean (s.d.) 8.8 (8.5)
Physician global assessment (0–10 scale) 3.6 (2.1)
HRQOL, mean (s.d)
    SF-36 PCS 38.1 (10.1)
    SF-36 MCS 48.5 (12.3)
    HAQ-DI (0–3) 0.94 (0.67)
    CESD (0–30) 8.4 (5.9)
    FACIT-Fatigue (0–52) 31.9 (12.55)
    UCLA SCTC GIT total score (0–3) 0.55 (0.46)

aData not available for two patients. bData not available for three patients. A higher score on the SF-36 and FACIT represents better HRQOL; a higher score on the HAQ-DI, CESD, and UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0 represents worse HRQOL.