Fig. 5.

Pairwise ROI relations. The pattern of identity (mis)classifications is separately compared for each pair of regions using correlation-based scores (red) and mutual information (brown). Specifically, we relate classification results across regions while controlling for the pattern of true labels. These measures are used as a proxy for assessing similarity in the encoding of facial identity across regions. Of the four ROIs, the raFG produced the highest scores in its relationship with the other regions (connector width is proportional to z values).