Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 17;21(7):1602–1612. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq225

Table 2.

Results for TMS experiment 2 (TD_nHF)

Stimulation Site MNI coordinates, x, y, z in [mm], (±SD) TpPath25, [ms], (P values) MaxDev, [mm], (P values) ReachTime, [ms], (P values) EndAcc, [mm], (P values)
SPLgroup −36, −49, 57 −12.9 ± 10.3 −0.4 ± 0.6 −4.1 ± 2.8 0.9 ± 0.6
IPSindiv −42.9, −45.0, 52.9, (±1.9 4.7 4.3) 18.3 ± 13.6 1.0 ± 0.9 −9.2 ± 7.2 1.8 ± 0.9, (<0.05)
SMGindiv −53.4, −32.5, 40.3, (±8.3 7.5 5.2) 22.4 ± 8.6, (<0.05) 0.9 ± 0.3 12.4 ± 6.2, (0.05) 0.0 ± 0.8

Note: The MNI coordinates upon which the TMS stimulation sites were planned are given and for TpPath25, MaxDev, ReachTime, and EndAcc, the difference ± SE between trials with versus without TMS is given for each TMS stimulation site—the data of both TMS SOAs is collapsed. Statistically significant differences are marked bold.