Table 3.
Results for TMS experiment 3 (HD)
| Stimulation Site | MNI coordinates, x, y, z in [mm], (±SD) | TpPath25, [ms], (P values) | MaxDev, [mm], (P values) | ReachTime, [ms], (P values) | EndAcc, [mm], (P values) |
| SPLgroup | −36, −49, 57 | 1.9 ± 7.4 | 0.2 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 10.3 | 0.3 ± 0.5 |
| IPSHDgroup | −39, −45, 50 | 15.2 ± 6.3, (<0.05) | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 21.2 ± 9.1 | 0.1 ± 0.4 |
| SMGgroup | −45, −40, 45 | 26.8 ± 5.6, (<0.001) | 0.5 ± 0.6 | 33.2 ± 5.6, (<0.01) | 0.1 ± 0.3 |
| SMGHDindiv | −48.2, −34.2, 38.5, (±8.3 6.3 7.0) | 16.3 ± 10.8, (<0.05) | −0.2 ± 0.4 | 31.3 ± 12.3, (<0.01) | 0.5 ± 0.7 |
| IPSHDright | 45, −39, 52 | 1.0 ± 10.0 | 0.2 ± 0.7 | 11.4 ± 8.8 | 0.6 ± 0.6 |
| Reach | −33, −56, 55 | 1.2 ± 6.5 | −0.2 ± 0.5 | 13.6 ± 8.5 | 0.7 ± 0.3 |
Note: The MNI coordinates upon which the TMS stimulation sites were planned are given and for TpPath25, MaxDev, ReachTime, and EndAcc, the difference ± SE between trials with versus without TMS is given for each TMS stimulation site. Statistically significant differences are marked bold. For ReachTime, the interaction TMS × stimulation site did not reach significance. Newman–Keuls rather than Fisher least significant difference was therefore used for multiple comparisons correction in this case.