Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 7;5:759–765. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S17457

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in pooled analysis of bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% in glaucoma treatment

Study number Number of patients enrolled in each group
Study duration, months Study design Primary efficacy endpoint Mean age (range), years
QD bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% BID bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% Comparator groups
18,14 240 240 122 12 R, DM, AC, PG IOP at 8am, 10am, 4pm 60.7 (22–90)
27,8 234 243 119 12 R, DM, AC, PG IOP at 8am, 10am, 4pm 62.4 (26–92)
3a6,9 167 131 81 36 R, DM, AC, PG IOP reduction from baseline 62.1 (32–91)
415,16 comparators: timolol 0.5%, exploratory bimatoprost formulation 129 391 12 R, DM, AC, PG IOP at 0, 2, 8 hours 59.4 (22–91)
515,16 comparators: timolol 0.5%, exploratory bimatoprost formulation 136 405 12 R, DM, AC, PG IOP at 0, 2, 8 hours 62.4 (24–90)
617 comparators: 2 exploratory bimatoprost formulations 187 374 12 R, DM, AC, PG Mean IOP 63.5 (23–94)

Note: Study 3a was a three-year extension of studies 1 and 2; at baseline, all patients had received 12 months of treatment.

Abbreviations: AC, active-controlled; BID, twice daily; DM, double-masked; IOP, intraocular pressure; PG, parallel group; QD, once daily; R, randomized.