Skip to main content
. 2011 May 9;7:157–166. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S19385

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Participants Intervention Outcomes Methodological quality Notes
Black et al17 1099 postmenopausal women from the US, originally with BMD ≤ 0.68 g/cm2, who received alendronate Alendronate 5 mg/day (n = 329) or 10 mg/day (n = 333) vs placebo (n = 437) for 5 years Change in BMD at hip and other sites
Changes in bone turnover markers
Fracture incidencea
Outcomes measured at 5-year follow-up
AS adequately generated AC not clear
Blinding: patients, physicians, data collectors, and outcome assessors
Incomplete data adequately addressed
No selective outcome reporting, or other threats to validity
Funded by Merck and Co. (makers of alendronate, the study drug)
Merck involved with study design, editorial input, and approval of final manuscript
Not all participants had “osteoporosis” by WHO definition, inclusion criterion was BMD ≤ 0.68 g/cm2
5 mg/day for 2 years and then 10 mg/day for a total mean duration of therapy of 5 years’ treatment during the Fracture Intervention Trial
Bone et al19 804 postmenopausal women from multiple countries with BMD T-scores <–2.5 underwent initial randomization; 247 included in the year 8–10 extension study (used for this review) Alendronate 5 mg/day (n = 78) vs 10 mg/day (n = 86) for 10 yrs vs 20 mg/day for 2 years then 5 mg/day for 3 years then placebo for 5 years (n = 83) Change in BMD at lumbar spine and other sites
Changes in bone turnover markers
Morphometric and clinical vertebral fracture incidenceb
Height change
Safety
Outcomes measured at either 2- or 5-year follow-up
AS and AC not clear
“Double blinded”, also data assessors blinded
Incomplete data not adequately addressed
All outcomes not fully reported
No other threats to validity
Funded by Merck
Research Laboratories (makers of alendronate, the study drug)
First author with honorariums and grant support from Merck
Miller et al18 97 postmenopausal women from the US with a history of fragility fracture completed 7 years of follow-up with at least 5 years of etidronate therapy Continued cyclical etidronate (n = 51) vs placebo (n = 46) (subgroups of larger extension study) Change in BMD at lumbar spine and other sites
Morphometric vertebral fracture incidence
Safety
Outcomes measured at 2-year follow-up
AS adequately generated
AC not clear
“Double blinded”
Incomplete data not adequately addressed
All outcomes not fully reported
No other threats to validity
Funded by Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals (makers of etidronate, the study drug)

Notes:

a

Fracture incidence was considered an exploratory outcome;

b

Fracture incidence collected as safety endpoint, no formal analysis planned. No attempt made to exclude trauma-related fractures.

Abbreviations: AC, allocation concealment; AS, allocation sequence; BMD, bone mineral density; WHO, World Health Organization.